Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux
On 2006-11-18, martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> wrote:
>
> --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> also sprach Lo=EFc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr> [2006.11.18.1204 +0100]:
>> True; but IMO xfsprogs is relatively stable,
>
> Where stability is relative to the filesystem. :)
>
> I actually would like to see the latest xfsprogs in etch simply
> because they contain fixes for the recent XFS kernel bugs, so if
> you've been bitten, you can at least get your data back.
With 2.6.17-stable bug -- corrected file system, so one will not
have unpleasant log messages futher. This is a problem of *testers*,
who was affected by that bug. It was said version .10 corrects fs, but
i saw people, who reported, that it doesn't...
____
Reply to: