Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils
>>>>> "Miles" == Miles Bader <email@example.com> writes:
Miles> [Isn't nfs4 rather different than previous versions, in
Miles> that it's fixed some of the most egregious "nfs
I have been told NFS 4 has nothing in common with NFS except the name,
and its reputation for being insecure (even if this reputation in
Miles> All things considered I'd rather have nfs, even in it's
Miles> horrid traditional form, than nothing.
There are still times when traditional NFS is still the best solution
(disclaimer: I haven't user NFS 4).
Does nfs-kernel-server support v4 yet?
Back on topic, is Samba included in the default installation?
If yes => should NFS be treated as lesser then Samba and not included
If no => why is NFS included when Samba isn't? Isn't this inconstant?
Anyway, just some thoughts - personally, for the rare case I need NFS,
I am happy to install it myself.
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>