Josselin Mouette <email@example.com> writes: > Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a écrit : >> I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a >> feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the package will stay >> installed), and new installs don't need to get nfs-kernel-server as part >> of the *default* install. > > We're not talking about the NFS server, but of the NFS client. And a > working NFS client is surely something we want as part of the default > install. What's the rationale for needing it as part of the default install? The majority of the Debian (and GNU/Linux systems in general) I see tend to not use NFS at all. Do we have any usage statistics for the NFS client? Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
Description: PGP signature