Re: Bug mass filling
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:36:43 -0700, Steve Langasek <email@example.com> said:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 04:36:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Since we already feel that our RM's are overworked (hence dunc-tank
>> and payment schemes), I strongly suggest we not add to the RM's
>> burdens any more than we have to.
> This is a laughable suggestion, given that the RMs' time is now
> being taken up defending the longstanding handling of BTS severities
> in this thread, when that is handling is precisely the one that,
> IME, minimizes the amount of work the release team should have to do
> to manually review bug states.
So, you want to be called in for every policy violation bug to
weigh in on the severity? Sounds like that would increase the
load. Just answering this question in the affiirmative would stop
this thread of discussion dead in its tracks.
Honi soit la vache qui rit.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C