Re: Centralized darcs
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Otavio Salvador <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Alexander Sack <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >> Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far toooo
> >> slow* for decent maintenance of large pieces of software. I tried once
> >> to create a mozilla repository, do some work with it and it was completely
> >> unusable. I am not talking about minutes, but almost hours to finish
> >> tasks that should take seconds.
> > It has improved a lot in last releases. You might redo your try.
> Would it be usable for a source tree of a size where dpatch usage
> becomes a pain?
I've used it with both the Linux kernel tree and Asterisk with good