On Jul 29, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote: > And this really is an "innovation". Woody to sarge upgrades didn't > require any manual intervention. It sucks that the udev upstream maintainers did not have a crystal ball to be able to prevent future bugs and suboptimal designs, but I suppose that this is how life works. > > If you do not consider this user interface good enough for your uses > > then feel free to implement the debconf interface described in #369479. > > You are wrong in arguing that this requirement is the result of an error > > on my part. > If you really want innovation, you should do it yourself. There is much > room for innovation in udev packaging. Instead of explaining on -devel I have other priorities, I suppose that given time I would eventually get to it. Asking a question with debconf is not "innovation", anyway. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature