Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:54:15 +0200
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
> I both cases, the circular dependency would be useful to avoid
> installing the common data without the software. Consequently, when
> you apt-get remove the software, you don't get an orphan data package.
You can then apply same logic to shared libraries to make them depend
on program which uses them to avoid orphan library packages. I think
that aptitude way is better.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Reply to:
- References:
- Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: David Weinehall <tao@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>