On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 08:39 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:38 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > I completely fail to see any logic here:
> > > * cdrtools, obviously completely non-free, is in main
> > what? you think if it is non-GPL than it should go to non-free? This
> > is nonsense.
> No. The primary issue is that the mixture of a GPL+CDDL work creates a
> work that cannot be distributed by anyone else but the copyright
It seems to be an offtopic here, but could you please elaborate a little
bit further, which particular statement of which license prevents it?