[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little

On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 18:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Yes:
> http://www.ouaza.com/wordpress/2006/06/23/the-python-transition-can-continue/
> I wonder if I should make a second announce on -devel-announce just to
> make it clear to everybody.

At the lease I would appreciate (as a python application package
maintainer) a post to debian-python with some confirmations from the
involved parties.

There has been a lot of confusion and conflict as to which solution
package maintainers should follow. A sign of agreement on that list
would be welcome. I would like to get a warm happy feeling that I won't
have to change packaging again in a few days/weeks.

It would also be helpful if this document
(was http://people.debian.org/~piman/python-policy/ before, but I just
noticed http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ is
also was updated with respect to the new rules (e.g. handling
of XS-Python_Version).

All in all I'm glad the conflicts seem to be over and appreciate the
hard work that has been put into this.

-- arthur - adejong@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: