Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:43:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:33:50PM +0200, Loïc Minier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > Probably the biggest reason why I feel this extra time would be useful
> > > is because the new Python Policy and the tools supporting it saw
> > > non-negligible changes in the last days. All of this only settled very
> > > recently. This explains why maintainers have been reluctant in moving
> > > packages to the new policy immediately.
> > >
> > > (This is not a call against properly done NMUs in general, but a
> > > specific call to postpone NMUs concerning the Python Policy by a few
> > > days because the situation just stabilized.)
> > Is it actually stabilized ?
> I wonder if I should make a second announce on -devel-announce just to
> make it clear to everybody.
I think it'd be better. With a statement about NMUs, it would be even