This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said: > It is not allowed to ship a binary which includes both GPL'd code and > GPL-incompatible code, whether you do so by dynamic or static linking, > and whether the GPL'd code directly or only indirectly depends upon > the GPL-incompatible code. This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said: > Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> writes: > > > libfoo will obviously have a NEEDED which lists libbar (and both > > libbar-ssl and libbar have a soname of libbar and have to conflict). > > I have no idea if that's what is "obvious". If it's true, then there > is no problem, provided the program actually works both ways. Thanks to Tollef and others for actually answering the question I asked. Thank you Thomas for the answers to questions I didn't ask, and for being consistent in them. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature