Re: Netatalk and SSL
Stephen Gran <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Unfortunately, it still doesn't answer the question I asked about
> transitive linking, where there is no shared library dependency from the
> GPL application to a GPL incompatible library.
Yes, it does.
It is not allowed to ship a binary which includes both GPL'd code and
GPL-incompatible code, whether you do so by dynamic or static linking,
and whether the GPL'd code directly or only indirectly depends upon
the GPL-incompatible code.