On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:09:07AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Christoph Haas schrieb: > > > >>>* NTP server > >>> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian > >>> NTP Team, which consists of zero active members) > > > >> I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and > >> I believe that this package is very important. Still I'd like to have a > >> co-maintainer for the package. Anyone else interested? I'd create an SVN > >> repository on my server or alioth. > > > > I have no problem with co-maintenance, but I'd have a problem with svn. > > Maybe bzr or git? I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I have moved away from repositories for my Debian packages lately. Darcs looks like a nice competitor but has some issues regarding checking in changes automatically (might as well be my ignorance but it sounds like I need weird scripts and a .procmailrc to merge changes automatically). For git and bzr there don't seem to be sophisticated tools to build packages (*-buildpackage). svn-buildpackage for example keeps the upstream tarballs in one directory but still builds from the trunk/ which is pretty nice. Well, well, all the RCS philosophy again. Too much choice. Kindly Christoph -- ~ ~ ".signature" [Modified] 1 line --100%-- 1,48 All
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature