Re: alternatives and priorities
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 03:23:09PM -0300, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> On Friday 19 May 2006 10:25, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > So, instead of using static feature lists to define an application's
> > priority with which it would be configured in the alternatives system,
> > why not use popcon data to do that instead? Using popcon would ensure
> > that the applications which most people prefer would be the default;
> > this is a fair and objective criterion.
> You would end up with nvi or nano as editors, since they are installed by
> default. Probably more as viewer and so on.
Which is bad why?
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4