[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: alternatives and priorities

On Sunday 21 May 2006 16:31, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > You would end up with nvi or nano as editors, since they are installed by
> > default. Probably more as viewer and so on.

> Which is bad why?

What I meant was that you would have a high number of installations for the 
packages that are installed by default in a normal installation, and that is 
not an objective way of getting information.

Reply to: