Re: Bug#366834: ITP: cxxtools -- library of unrelated, but useful C++ classes
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Michael Banck <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral?
> Don't know about you, but the FSF does - it has created the LGPL because
> of this.
Actually, they don't. They consider the GPL a perfectly valid license
for a library; however, they also consider that in some cases, it *may*
be better to use the LGPL instead. Just not all of them.
Why do you think they
* Never released libreadline under anything else than the GPL,
* Renamed the LGPL from the "Library GPL" to the "Lesser GPL"?
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4