Re: Bug#366834: ITP: cxxtools -- library of unrelated, but useful C++ classes
Michael Banck <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Kari Pahula <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
>> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
> Non-GPL compatible applications, you mean?
Which non-GPL license can I choose for a software that uses this
> Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral?
Don't know about you, but the FSF does - it has created the LGPL because
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)