Re: Bug#366834: ITP: cxxtools -- library of unrelated, but useful C++ classes
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kari Pahula <email@example.com> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> > * License : GPL v2 or later
> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
Non-GPL compatible applications, you mean?
> Why don't you choose (if possible) a less "viral" licence?
Wow. First off, Kari does not appear to be upstream, so who are you
addressing? Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral?