[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: amd64 uploads

Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@m4x.org> writes:

Moreover, looking at [1], there is a quite rather impressive list of package that FTBFS since ages, that are apparently unmaintained, and whose maintainer looks like to be MIA since more than a year (all packages are the same version as in stable, or NMU-ed, and a lot of important — or higher severities — opened bugs for more than a year, not to mention the ones that are tagged 'patch').

There is also a number of packages (418) that used to build (available
on amd64.debian.net) but now FTBFS or Dep-Wait on something that
FTBFS. All of those you can probably summarize under bit-rot. The
Debian-amd64 team has now started doing some aggressive porter NMUs
(policy allows them after 7 days so don't come screaming if we NMU
some month old bug).


This one dep-wait on the wrong package.

I also noticed cpuburn has not been rebuilt, probably because it is listed i386 only in Package-Arch-Specific, whereas the amd64 team was probably using another version of this file.

  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

Reply to: