On Sunday 26 March 2006 20:18, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old > debian changelog files. Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from before oldstable release. Based on the assumption that oldstable -> stable updates occur more or less over the whole stable+1 development circle. So currently, I'd cut everything that pre-dates woody release - probably nobody will do a potato -> woody upgrade. But woody is still quite a bit in use, and so those people could track the changelog without looking at multiple versions even if they do partial upgrades and their system spans woody to sid. (Obviously some person will have a system spanning potato to sid and miss the most relevant entry. So never cutting changelogs is another very obvious possibility....) cheers -- vbi -- Man kommt in der Ehe am besten aus, wenn man nicht liebt; sowie am besten, wenn man bloß liebt. -- Jean Paul
Attachment:
pgp8Xiy86f1un.pgp
Description: PGP signature