[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again)

> Is there anyone from Debian who thinks that changing the Maintainer
> field is a bad idea in these cases (remember that this isn't about
> credit, because we would certainly request that the Debian maintainer
> still be mentioned as such in a suitable fashion)?

So deep in a thread that certainly can be called a flamewar, you
probably need to quietly ask this elsewhere if you want answers from a
real majority of ppl..:-)

Reply to: