On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:02:32AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Kevin Mark] > > that would suggest that its the RM who has decided such issues in the > > past unilaterilly. > Conventional wisdom is that release management involves so much > drudgery and so little recognition that the *least* we can do is let > the release manager decide on codenames and version numbers. IMHO, watching people spend their time on a thread talking about changing the release version number now that we've already frozen is far more dreary than any of the most tedious work that has to be done to get a release out. But I guess *participating* in it is subjectively less dreary, or there would be more people working on fixing RC bugs and volunteering to help process upgrade reports. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature