Andrea Mennucc wrote: > > see shy jo, who argued for 4.0 at the appropriate time to discuss the > > version number to use > > That is puzzling me. In 2003, in the thread starting at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/01/msg00337.html > most people were agreeing with calling sarge "4.0". > I inderstand from your signature that you were for "4.0" as well > (altough I do not find your support in above thread). IIRC it was an earlier thread; afaik the release managers decided on 3.1. The thread you referenced was semi-pointless since it had, again, already been decided by that point. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature