On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 12:40:37AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > > Indeed. Editing plain text configuration files has never been the Unix > > way, and vi certainly isn't a standard unix tool. > No, I'm saying why are people attempting to replace what already works with > something new and obfusicated? Because dynamic device nodes have lots of benefits. (Less clutter, better support of dynamic devices, better device names, better API for writing drivers) In short, hardcoded /dev nodes don't "already work". Though I have to say, that was a pretty amusing remark coming from one of the upstream authors of "shoop". Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature