Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:37:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Yeah; vi not behaving like vi by default seems like a showstopper.
But that is not the case. vi by default not acting like a very old and
(imho) broken version of vi... is not a showstopper.
I love vi - and I love the progress vim has made to make use of vi
quicker/better/easier. I don't see that the world has to be stuck in
1985 - should we still be shipping a linux kernel version 1?