Re: /run vs /var/run (was: Please test new sysvinit)
Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
> The principle is the same: /lib is used only for the minimal system required
> for booting, and everything else should go in /usr/lib. /run should be used
> only for junk that needs to be stored early in the boot sequence, and
> everything else should go in /var/run.
Under Linux, can't all of this be done with mount --move anyway? I'm not
convinced that we actually need a /run any more.
Matthew Garrett | firstname.lastname@example.org