Re: /run vs /var/run (was: Please test new sysvinit)

[Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:

> The principle is the same: /lib is used only for the minimal system required
> for booting, and everything else should go in /usr/lib.  /run should be used
> only for junk that needs to be stored early in the boot sequence, and
> everything else should go in /var/run.

Under Linux, can't all of this be done with mount --move anyway? I'm not
convinced that we actually need a /run any more.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.devel@srcf.ucam.org