On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 13:35 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On 12/14/05, Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote: > > > Likewise for mozilla-firefox-adblock (2 months), new version of tidy (1 > > month), xplc (1 month), cvsconnect (1 month), cvssuck (1 month), libmpd (1 > > month); if there's something wrong with each of these packages, the > > packager should know by now. Maybe in some cases he does, but in others it > > appears clear that the packager doesn't know. > > Shouldn't information like what's wrong be posted in public so others know too? My proposal would be exactly like that: extend the NEW queue information page with a comments field where FTP-master can add any comments for packages that aren't approved or rejected when first examined. It would just have to contain a quick note about the problems and what this package is waiting for. Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part