Re: buildd administration
Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Er, did you even *read* this thread? We got on the topic of buildds because
> *someone refused to help diagnose build failures because they consider it the
> buildd admin's job*.
NO. We got on the topif of this because I said that I was not
interested in diagnosing build failures, since when I had done so in
the past, my diagnoses seemed to be ignored, and the diagnosing seems
to have been entirely wasted work.