[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable



On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:12:45PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:

> > The situation is: gcc-2.95 is no longer needed to compile debian packages,
> > but it is still needed for other tasks, by many people.
> 
> By whom, and for what? So far I haven't heard a specific project's
> name.

Debian does not exist for the benefit of its developers, it exists for
the benefit of its users. I doubt that many Debian *users* read
debian-devel so they aren't going to be responding to messages in this
thread. 

I am quite sure that there are Debian *users* out there that have legacy
code that only builds under gcc 2.95 (or more likely g++ 2.95) and they
haven't ported it to a newer C compiler because there is no business
case for it. 

Removing a package simply because the Debian developers don't need it
any more is the kind of arrogance that drives users away from Debian to
other distributions.

-- 
Dave Carrigan
Seattle, WA, USA
dave@rudedog.org | http://www.rudedog.org/
UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-C++-DNS-PalmOS-PostgreSQL-MySQL-Postfix

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: