[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits from the release team: the plans for etch

On 10/26/05, Gabor Gombas <gombasg@sztaki.hu> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:11:00AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peńa wrote:
> > That really depends on the daemon itself don't you think? There's a number of
> > daemons that don't create any file at all or, if they do, are created
> > only on a given directory which is removed on purge. In these cases, removing
> > the user on postrm's purge might make sense. As I said, that would be an
> > option.
> It is still possible that those daemons _read_ some files (e.g. config
> files), and the admin did a chown/chgrp to the daemon's user. Removing
> the user and reusing the UID/GID will suddenly make those files

Removing the user is 'fine', it's the reusing that's the issue. But
isn't that your own fault if you choose to reuse numbers?

Reply to: