On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:23:45PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2005, Pierre Machard wrote: > > Anyway I do not understand why this issue is a problem since we > > Because instead of doing this: > > 127.0.0.1 localost localhost.localdomain > > It was done like this: > > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost > > Thus changing the canonical name of the loopback interface. PLEASE do not > do this unless you have *extremely* good reasons to do so. An untracked DNS > timeout is definately not one. If you can still reproduce the problem, we > can work on tracking that thing down without the localhost.localdomain. The fact is that nobody complained about that... and my bug was repported more than one year and a half ago. Plus It was disscussed on debian-devel. Please do not argue with me! I do not pretend that I know anything in name resolution, however I proposed something that worked on my system. It was widely discussed. I joined this current thread to show people who do not read -devel every day that we have already talk about it. Nothing more, nothing less. Please have a look at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/thrd2.html Subject: /etc/hosts: Two lines with the same IP address? by Thomas Hood Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <pmachard@debian.org> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature