On Wednesday 21 September 2005 15.30, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [arch release criteria] > Personally, I find the list of requirements sensible, and very > understandable after the clarifying rounds on the lists. This colors > my view of the discussion. AOL!!1! The only thing I'd modify is the 50 users thingy - drop that, because - as Ingo says - it's hard to tell, on the assumption that if there are enough Debian *and* upstream people to maintain kernel, toolchain, libc, boot-loader and Debian installer (d-i or other), there is enough justification for the port. So 'm68k is having difficulty showing 50 users' becomes 'will m68k get a working gcc4 within a reasonable timeframe' which is easier to demonstrate. (I'm *not* just bashing m68k here. There are other arches where gcc4 ICEs, too, and there was quite a bit discussion about non-working kernels on certain SPARC variants IIRC.) That said, I can live with the 50 users idea. cheers -- vbi -- featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/smtp
Attachment:
pgpTZDDcW77gS.pgp
Description: PGP signature