Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
On Sep 09, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> > There is nothing wrong with this, and I'm not a fan of choice of venue
> > clauses either, but they should try to modify the DFSG then.
> Could you explain why DFSG#5 couldn't be invoked in this case?
It does not work this way. If you believe that a license is not free
it's up to you explaining why.
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Debian OpenSolaris port, exchange with Sun folks in webforum/MailingList
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>