On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 06:32:26PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:53:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > /run/bootchart, but there seems to be some resistance to actually trying to > > standardize on /run :) > what about /dev/shm? Aside from the other objections voiced that it abuses that namespace, I also object to it because it inappropriately ties the required feature (early availability of read-write space for data that doesn't persist across reboots) to a particular implementation, instead of leaving the admin free to structure the mounts in a way that's most appropriate for the system. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature