[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Using buildds only

On 8/22/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:37:10 +0200, W Borgert <debacle@debian.org> said:
> > Quoting Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>:
> >> I used to think that too.  I took a wander through queue/reject on
> >> merkel.  I don't think that any more.  I'm curious as to how Ubuntu
> >> is going to sustain source-only uploads, honestly.
> > Mandatory, signed build and test logs?  I've no idea...
>        UN-sustainable, in my opinion. The minute you add bits that
>  make maintainers prove they are  doing something, you enter an
>  antagonistic relationship -- and my first inclination was to write up
>  a tool to forge  such logs, and uipload that to Debian.

Indeed. Why would those checks be done client-side instead of
server-side anyway?

Reply to: