Re: Using buildds only
On 8/22/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:37:10 +0200, W Borgert <debacle@debian.org> said:
>
> > Quoting Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>:
> >> I used to think that too. I took a wander through queue/reject on
> >> merkel. I don't think that any more. I'm curious as to how Ubuntu
> >> is going to sustain source-only uploads, honestly.
>
> > Mandatory, signed build and test logs? I've no idea...
>
> UN-sustainable, in my opinion. The minute you add bits that
> make maintainers prove they are doing something, you enter an
> antagonistic relationship -- and my first inclination was to write up
> a tool to forge such logs, and uipload that to Debian.
Indeed. Why would those checks be done client-side instead of
server-side anyway?
Reply to: