Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)
From: "W. Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:37:10 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1124714230.4309c6f661307@webmail.in-berlin.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050822122242.GA32115@hezmatt.org>
References: <20050821015824.GT16930@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 4308B9D7.4050305@jones.dk> <[🔎] 20050822062417.GA16866@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 1124700358.430990c6b8240@webmail.in-berlin.de> <[🔎] 20050822122242.GA32115@hezmatt.org>

Quoting Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>:
> I used to think that too.  I took a wander through queue/reject on merkel.
> I don't think that any more.  I'm curious as to how Ubuntu is going to
> sustain source-only uploads, honestly.

Mandatory, signed build and test logs?  I've no idea...

Cheers, WB

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)
  - From: Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org>
- Re: Using buildds only
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org (va, manoj)>

References:
- Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)
  - From: "W. Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
- Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)
  - From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)
Next by Date: Re: "block" feature description
Previous by thread: Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)
Next by thread: Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread