[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal

Hash: SHA1

On 21-08-2005 03:58, Wouter Verhelst wrote:

> We also came to the conclusion that some of the requirements proposed in
> Vancouver would make sense as initial requirements -- requirements that
> a port would need to fulfill in order to be allowed on the mirror
> network -- but not necessarily as an 'overall' requirement -- a
> requirement that a port will always need to fulfill if it wants to be
> part of a stable release, even if it's already on the mirror network.
> Those would look like this:
> Overall:
> - binaries must have been built and signed by official Debian
>   Developers

Currently, sponsored packages are only signed, not built, by official
Debian Developers.

Is that intended to change, or is it a typo in the proposal?

Please cc me, as I am not subscribed to d-devel.

 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


Reply to: