Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 21-08-2005 03:58, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> We also came to the conclusion that some of the requirements proposed in
> Vancouver would make sense as initial requirements -- requirements that
> a port would need to fulfill in order to be allowed on the mirror
> network -- but not necessarily as an 'overall' requirement -- a
> requirement that a port will always need to fulfill if it wants to be
> part of a stable release, even if it's already on the mirror network.
> Those would look like this:
> - binaries must have been built and signed by official Debian
Currently, sponsored packages are only signed, not built, by official
Is that intended to change, or is it a typo in the proposal?
Please cc me, as I am not subscribed to d-devel.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----