[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)


W. Borgert [2005-08-22 14:37 +0200]:
> Quoting Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>:
> > I used to think that too.  I took a wander through queue/reject on merkel.
> > I don't think that any more.  I'm curious as to how Ubuntu is going to
> > sustain source-only uploads, honestly.
> Mandatory, signed build and test logs?  I've no idea...

Ubuntu does not do anything of that sort. If I merely fix a
description or add a Recommends:, I don't need to bother with
rebuilding the package locally, and if I fix something bigger, I need
to build and test the package anyway.

The system of source uploads works well in Ubuntu, so please don't try
to invent problems which don't matter in reality.

Have a nice day,

Martin Pitt        http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: