Re: arch, svn, cvs
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:17:35PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> like a foundation already: a bad release manager chose a pyramidal
> model. That's the beginnings of a good inductive argument. Then we
> add the other foundation he gives: here's a bunch of well-managed
> projects, which use a non-pyramidal scheme.
http://www.zedshaw.com/blog/programming/programmer_stats.html
Particularly, in this instance, the section on Confounding.
- Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@familiasanchez.net>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
- From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>