Re: arch, svn, cvs
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
> It's completely unfounded bullshit.
Do you have a specific complaint? Or is every single sentence in that
post "unfounded bullshit"?
> Whether you prefer a pyramid or lots of commiters style organization
> is pretty much a personal or rather community organizational issue.
Yes, and Greg is saying that a pyramidal structure doesn't work well,
and that bitkeeper doesn't really have many advantages unless you are
using a pyramidal structure.
> Both have their up- and downsides. All the actual arguments he
> presents are totally unfounded,
All of them? Really? ALL of them? You're speaking about someone
with considerable expertise in release management, you know...
> abd besides that bitkeeper as the
> specific SCM he mentions supports multiple commiters style
> development just fine - for bkbits.net projects for example you can
> add multiple ssh keys and thus let different people push to the same
> repository.
It's as if you didn't bother reading what he wrote, like where he
says, "Of course, Bitkeeper can still work with centralized project
management..."
Thomas
Reply to: