Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?
On 8/11/05, Goswin von Brederlow <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Processing time to do a dinstall cycle and pulse all mirrors is quite
> high. You would hit mirrors with the next pulse while the old one
> still runs a lot of the time and, even worse, update the master mirror
> between phase1 and phase2 of the mirror run causing the mirror to be
> incosistent for some time.
> Also the download traffic would greatly increase with people
> downloading Packages.bz2 files every hour.
Is downloading deltas/diffs still not supported?
> All that just to break your sid an hour earlier?
Wouldn't that be between 0 and 24 hours earlier?