[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?

On 8/11/05, Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Processing time to do a dinstall cycle and pulse all mirrors is quite
> high. You would hit mirrors with the next pulse while the old one
> still runs a lot of the time and, even worse, update the master mirror
> between phase1 and phase2 of the mirror run causing the mirror to be
> incosistent for some time.
> Also the download traffic would greatly increase with people
> downloading Packages.bz2 files every hour.

Is downloading deltas/diffs still not supported?

> All that just to break your sid an hour earlier?

Wouldn't that be between 0 and 24 hours earlier?

Reply to: