Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098)
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 22:56 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> So you're complaining that this jackd bug is exemplary of
> "unneccessary" breakages in unstable, and yet you don't even know if
> there is a good reason for this bug. You don't know if this is tied to
> the gcc change.
I believe that #318098 can be simply avoided by not doing dist-upgrade
(ie. not install new conflicting jackd). How simple and how much
flames :-(.
--
Ondrej Sury <ondrej@sury.org>
Reply to: