[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098)

On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 22:56 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> So you're complaining that this jackd bug is exemplary of
> "unneccessary" breakages in unstable, and yet you don't even know if
> there is a good reason for this bug. You don't know if this is tied to
> the gcc change. 

I believe that #318098 can be simply avoided by not doing dist-upgrade
(ie. not install new conflicting jackd).  How simple and how much
flames :-(.
Ondrej Sury <ondrej@sury.org>

Reply to: