[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libxml++2.10



> Hi Nikita,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 28.07.2005, 12:04 +0400 schrieb Nikita V.
>
> Youshchenko:
> > > I talked to upstream and they
> > > said, the ABI broke during the development unintentionally, but we
> > > should better stick to libxml++2.6-2.10.0 and recompile the
> > > dependent packages.
> >
> > Is 2.10 backward-compatable with 2.6 at ABI level ?
>
> As I said, the ABI broke unintentionally (and they were most agrieved),
> so I guess there might be some glitches. Upstream advised us to
> recompile the depending packages. I'm not sure at which stage the ABI
> broke (from which version on).

If so, I believe soname should be changed, to meet Debian quality 
standards.

Attachment: pgp8Hrpkfv9Zu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: