Hi Nikita, Am Donnerstag, den 28.07.2005, 12:04 +0400 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko: > > I talked to upstream and they > > said, the ABI broke during the development unintentionally, but we > > should better stick to libxml++2.6-2.10.0 and recompile the dependent > > packages. > > Is 2.10 backward-compatable with 2.6 at ABI level ? As I said, the ABI broke unintentionally (and they were most agrieved), so I guess there might be some glitches. Upstream advised us to recompile the depending packages. I'm not sure at which stage the ABI broke (from which version on). I got Murray Cumming in a mail conversation with all the Debian package maintainers back then, but I can't really tell, how the current state in Debian is. Have a nice day, Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part