> > For one of our internal projects, libxml++2.6 was too old. > > So I've created a package for libxml++2.10, using debian/ dir for the > > latest libxml++2.6 package. > > I packaged it for Ubuntu - libxml++2.6 and libxml++2.10 were never > designed to be installable parallely. I believe my package could be installed parallely with 2.6 However, I don't know if it is worth doing so. > I talked to upstream and they > said, the ABI broke during the development unintentionally, but we > should better stick to libxml++2.6-2.10.0 and recompile the dependent > packages. Is 2.10 backward-compatable with 2.6 at ABI level ?
Description: PGP signature