Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > In this context, woody->sarge transition packages are just one
> > form of useless cruft that we should strive to get rid of before
> > the etch release. They're not the biggest source of cruft, but on
> > the other hand they are (IMHO) one of the sources for which the
> > proper course of action is clearest.
> In such case, could we please codify that in policy?
Surely the release manager's decision on the matter when properly
publisized is information enough?
Tell me something interesting about yourself.
Lie if you have to.
-- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/archives/batch20.php