Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > In this context, woody->sarge transition packages are just one
> > form of useless cruft that we should strive to get rid of before
> > the etch release. They're not the biggest source of cruft, but on
> > the other hand they are (IMHO) one of the sources for which the
> > proper course of action is clearest.
>
> In such case, could we please codify that in policy?
Surely the release manager's decision on the matter when properly
publisized is information enough?
Don Armstrong
--
Tell me something interesting about yourself.
Lie if you have to.
-- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/archives/batch20.php
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: