[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: libssh - SSH and SCP library

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:24:29PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester wrote :
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 07:34:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote :
> > Le mardi 05 juillet 2005 ? 18:27 +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester a
> > ?crit :
> > > I see your point. I tried to fix that. Hope I didn't do it wrong
> > > (again). If someone could check...
> > 
> > I don't understand your modifications. There are differences in the
> > Makefile.in and configure files, but no differences in the Makefile.am
> > and configure.ac files. Also, I don't understand the shlibs.local file.
> > 
> The modifications in Makefile.in were made to change the SONAME and
> filename of the library (now libssh-0.11.so.0).

I also did some modifications for creating both shared and static
library, and installing files correctly.

> I don't remember changing anything in the configure file.

The modifications in configure file were made since the upstream
compiled an example binary which I think has nothing to do in the

> There is indeed no changes in Makefile.am and configure.ac files since
> they don't exist.
> The shlibs.local was designed to be the shlibs file for the package, but
> was useless since the shlibs file used is the one created by
> dh_makeshlibs.
> > > Should the package name contain the version number? (like the libssl
> > > packages)
> > 
> > Yes, it should be called libssh-0.11-0.
> I'd rather call it libssh0.11 or libssh-0.11, since the -0 is the
> package version number (I took the libssl0.9.7 package as example :
> package name is libssl0.9.7, package version is 0.9.7g-1, and package
> filename is libssl0.9.7_0.9.7g-1_i386.deb).


Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: