On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:33:27AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 01:25 +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:23:58PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:14:33AM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>> without the usual signature describing how > > > >>> to unsubscribe from debian-devel. Was this the case for everyone, or is > > > >>> there something between the debian servers and my mail client that > > > >>> occasionally (but very rarely) strips signatures? > > > > > > > I see it at the end of your email: > > > > > > > The way it was explained to me on the Evolution ML is that the > > > > "disappearing unsub message" only happens only happens to emails > > > > that have attachments. For example, digital signatures. The > > > > ML manager blindly tacks the unsub text to the end of the email, > > > > and the MUA doesn't "see" it, because it only knows to process > > > > the attachments (text/plain & application/pgp-signature being 99.99% > > > > of the attachments to emails on this list). > > > > > > > View the raw source of such a "disappearing unsub message" email, > > > > and you will see that the text is there. > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > > It doesn't include it in some cases where it knows it won't show. > > I wonder what it's rule set is. > :0 fbw * ! ^Content-Transfer-Encoding:.*base64 * ! ^Content-Transfer-Encoding:.*quoted-printable | cat - footer.txt realistically, we should be checking if it's a multipart message and adding a block if this is the case. Pasc -- Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672 Do Not Bend
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature