Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please
Russell Coker <email@example.com> writes:
> You could help by listing the anti-spam measures that you consider to be
> acceptable. Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not helpful.
I am ok with anti-spam measures which enable a well-behaving false
positive sender to know they have run afoul, and in which the
maintainers of the mechanism promise to try and adjust the system so
that the false-positive in question doesn't recur, taking
responsibility for false positives.