Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Jun 18, Bastian Blank <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 11:28:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> > Stop sending mail from dynamically-assigned IP addresses. Deal.
>> Please show me how to check for "dynamically-assigned IP".
> If your ISP is a good ISP, this will be advertised (by way of DNS,
> whois records or private communications).
> If it is less than good then I will take an educated guess. HTH.
So even if I stop sending mail from dynamically assigned addresses (a
requirement you have made up for yourself anyway, of the same value as
"don't send mail from hostnames with a Q in them") you still are going
to block email sometimes from me?
Is this another example of "no false positives" in action?
How about *you* fix your systems for breaking the RFCs, rather than
inventing requirements that I'm supposed to adhere to, and even if I
do, *still* sometimes hosing me?